Estranged Justice: Unveiling the Shadows of the Idaho Four Case
A Deep Dive into Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson and Judge John Judge's Past Rulings
In the Idaho Four case, shadows of past legal battles cast doubt on the pursuit of justice. As we peel back the layers of this enigmatic case, we uncover unsettling parallels to past trials handled by Prosecutor Bill Thompson and Judge John Judge.
Bill Thompson, the prosecutor leading the charge in the Idaho Four Case, has a track record marked by high-profile cases, including the costly conviction of Charles Capone for his estranged wife's murder. Echoing the haunting lyrics of Guns N' Roses' "Estranged," The eerie similarities between the Capone case and the Kohberger case raise questions about Thompson's approach to justice. In both instances, the prosecution relied heavily on speculative evidence and circumstantial narratives, leading to convictions without bodies or conclusive proof.
Furthermore, Thompson's own government website boasts of the excellence of his civil department, yet his actions in the courtroom seem to contradict this reputation. Are we witnessing a dissonance between his official persona and his courtroom tactics?
Meanwhile, Judge John Judge's lenient sentencing in a 2017 case involving the shooting death of a Pullman High School senior raises eyebrows. Despite the gravity of the crime, Judge opted for a halfway house-style program instead of jail or prison time. With Thompson as the prosecuting force behind this decision, one can't help but question the integrity of the legal system in Latah County.
In a world where the lines between right and wrong blur, it becomes imperative to scrutinize the actions of those entrusted with upholding the law. Only by confronting these discrepancies head-on can we hope to unravel the mysteries of the Idaho Four case and ensure that justice prevails.
In the end, as the lyrics of "Estranged" echo in our minds, we must remain vigilant in our pursuit of truth, refusing to turn a blind eye to the injustices that plague our legal system. For in the pursuit of truth, there can be no room for shadows or secrets – only the unwavering light of justice.
In the words of Guns N' Roses, "When you're talkin' to yourself / And nobody's home / You can fool yourself / You came in this world alone."
Josh did you read the Moscow Sticker case? It is a civil case currently ongoing. Parties sued include Latham County, MPD, Bill Thompson, Moscow city. It shows indelibly how LE in Moscow is capable of prevaricating civil rights even of minors, withholding evidence, covering up police misconduct.
I was wondering if this stickergate could be behind the Brady Giglio request of the defense in the BK’s trial.
Apparently officers Gundersonn and Nunes were directly involved in the sticker case and in suppressing the video and were first responders at king road. (Nunes is named in the PCA). Police hiding evidence, giving false statements and covering up fall within the Brady Giglio rule.
There are many worrying elements in the proceedings. I leave out investigation and the PCA (the latter presents so many problems which in my opinion make the arrest warrant unjustified and therefore the case should be dismissed - food for another day)
Discovery is being delayed repeatedly, the prosecution denying the existence of material referred to in other discovered documents - outright lie. The judge never reprimands the prosecution even when misconduct is blatant. Witnesses refuse to speak to the defense.
One thing is unclear to me due to my ignorance on US law: when a submission by the prosecution is sealed by the court, does the defense have access to it? I cannot find any information on this point on any search I make.
Another question for you: the media regularly throws wild accusations to discredit the character of the defendant which sway public opinion against him and ultimately influence jurors. Despite the gag order Steve Goncalves is constantly leaking information and giving interviews where he refers to the crime: how can the trial be fair in the circumstances? If the district Court does nothing shouldn’t the department of justice or the attorney general intervene?
Thank you Josh.